Search for: "FIELDS v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler’s the Federal Courts and the Federal System (2015); see also Richard H. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
When the scientists conduct research that threatens politically correct beliefs, then the scientists must be attacked, diminished, and discredited. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Additionally, McWane has already undertaken corrective measures to resolve the violations, at a cost of more than $7.6 million. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
The essay concludes by suggesting that social credit represents the expression of new forms of governance that are possible only through the correct utilization of big data management. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]